It’s two weeks away now, and I still can’t make my mind up about this fight. Ignoring the fact that Brock was given a title shot based on a loss to Frank Mir and a win over Heath Herring, it’s a pretty good matchup. Everyone seems to have an opinion, but there are as many people in both camps. So let’s analyse the advantages of each fighter. I realize I might be off on these because I’ve really only seen Lesnar fight twice.
Randy has:
*The experience advantage (Relevant, but perhaps not as important as some think. Randy hasn’t faced a wrestler of Brock’s caliber before in MMA – Randleman is a LHW)
*More technical boxing (It’s impossible to know how much of a factor this will be until we see how the wrestling matches up)
*Better cardio (Big factor)
*Better jiu jitsu (Probably not going to be a factor – Randy doesn’t go for a lot of submissions, and a guy as explosive as Brock would be hard to submit even for someone who’s got a lot of submission wins)
Brock’s advantages are:
*Strength (I think this will be less of a factor than people seem to assume. Randy has made big guys look weak many times before, so even if Brock outmuscles him I doubt he’ll be able to manhandle him)
*Speed (this is another big one)
*Reactions (one has to assume at ages 31 vs 45)
*Reach
I believe in Randy couture. If it were a 1-round fight, I think it would be a different story, but Couture has the advantage of cardio. If Brock Lesnar comes out aggressive like he has in the past, but can’t put Randy away within one or two rounds, he’s got to supply 275 pounds of muscle with oxygen for another fifteen minutes. Randy is an expert at tiring people out. The longer the fight goes, the more dominant he usually looks. However, given the huge size and speed advantage, it is also possible that Brock might put Randy on his back and finish him there, or hits him with a giant bomb before Randy gets the clinch. I’m not putting any money on this one.
In other news, I think they’re grooming Demian Maia for a title shot. Not that I mind, I love seeing that guy fight. He’s fighting fan favourite Nate Quarry on the televised undercard. This one seems like an easy fight for Maia. Nate fights on toughness, and he’s got it in spades, but neither strength or heart are really that big of a factor if you end up in the guard of a guy with a resume that reads like this:
“My main titles in BJJ are three-time World Cup champion, two-time World Champion, Pan American champion 2006, ADCC champion 2007, ADCC 2nd place in 2005, Brazilian champion, 7x state champion, 4x Brazilian team champion.”
At that point, it’s all about technique and timing.
The third interesting fight on this card is Kenny Florian vs Joe Stevenson. Both are fairly highly ranked and have some momentum, but they both got demolished by Sherk and BJ Penn, respectively. In my opinion, Joe Stevenson has defeated higher quality opponents (Yves Edwards, Kurt Pellegrino). Still, it’s a bad style matchup for him. Kenny has better technical striking, better jiu jitsu and better footwork. I see Florian winning this match in much the same fashion he beat Roger Huerta.

